Sunday, September 8, 2019

Ancient DNA from India’s Rakhigarhi archaeological site is telling volumes about the destiny of the mysterious Indus Valley Civilization.

Ancient DNA from India’s Rakhigarhi archaeological site is telling volumes about the destiny of the mysterious Indus Valley Civilization.

Around 3000 BC, Neolithic hunters in northern Scotland began settling into new sedentary lifestyles and erected vast stone circles and burial chambers, while in Egypt at this time the first pyramids were built. Meanwhile, the Harappans of South Asia, better known as the Indus Valley Civilization , erected massive brick housing complexes connected with extensive canal systems , yet hardly anything was known of the actual people, until now.

At its peak the civilization covered northwestern India and parts of eastern Pakistan and besides ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia it was one of the world’s first urban agricultural societies with five cities holding a population of between 1 million and 5 million. The series of collapses of ancient Egyptian dynasties is relatively well known, but the causes of the fall of the Harappan civilization around 1700 BC are much less understood, and that’s why this new genome research of an ancient Harappan is making the headlines.

Hot Climates Scorch Scientists Efforts
The team of researchers, led by geneticist David Reich from Harvard University and archaeologist Vasant Shinde at Deccan College in Pune, India, published their new study on Cell, based on studies at the Indus site known as Rakhigarhi, about 93 miles (150 kilometers) northwest of modern-day Delhi. “More than 60 skeletal pieces, including numerous petrous bones” were tested before the scientists successfully found and extracted a sample of ancient DNA, according to the scientists report.


Rakhigarhi archaeological site, India. (Homeric Origins / YouTube)

Rakhigarhi archaeological site, India. (Homeric Origins / YouTube)

An article in Science Mag explains that the region’s hot climate quickly degrades genetic material and while hundreds of skeletons have been unearthed in the Indus Valley this is the first one to hold valuable DNA, which the report says was sequenced more than 100 times to piece together what was called a “relatively complete genome”. Reich said, “There’s no doubt this is the most intensive effort we’ve ever made to get ancient DNA from a single sample.” While the findings say little about ‘why’ the society collapsed a new story is revealed about its continuing genetic legacy in modern Indians.

5,000-Year-Old Harappan Migrants
The DNA was sampled from an individual that was most likely female, who was found buried among dozens of ceramic bowls and vases dated to between 2800 and 2300 BC. Her genome closely matched DNA samples from 11 other individuals who had been found in Iran and Turkmenistan, with whom the Harrapans traded. Because the 11 individuals had ”little in common genetically with others buried in their regions,” Reich and researchers concluded that they were most likely Harappan migrants .


The Helpful Harappan Explains How Ancient Indus Valley Technology Could Solve Many of Today’s Problems
Archaeologists may have located ancient port dating back 4,500 years in Goa
Ancient City of Mohenjo Daro Has Survived 5 Millennia but May Disappear in 2 Decades
The Bronze Age spread of Yamnaya Steppe pastoralist ancestry into two subcontinents—Europe and South Asia. (Science / Fair Use)

The Bronze Age spread of Yamnaya Steppe pastoralist ancestry into two subcontinents—Europe and South Asia. (Science / Fair Use )

The researchers next compared these genetic signatures against DNA from ancient Eurasians as well as modern populations and the researchers made an ‘Indus family tree’ which reveals in its bowers that “genetic stock from the ancient Harrapan civilization can be found in most of today’s Indian population ”, according to the report in  Cell.

Ancient Origins of Harappans Rewritten
What’s more, the paper also says that modern people from north India have “the genetic marks” of Harappans having interbreed with animal herders living on the Eurasian steppe , “moving southward around 2000 BC”. And explaining the once-perplexing genetic link between Europeans and South Asians those steppe herders must have carried European DNA, from previous interbreeding events, and over the next three millennia the groups in north and south India intermixed, leading to the current population’s “complex ancestral mix”.

Evidence suggests Rakhigarhi was a major Harappan city center. (Homeric Origins / YouTube)

Evidence suggests Rakhigarhi was a major Harappan city center. (Homeric Origins / YouTube)

A side observation which excites scientists provides new answers for why ancient Iranian DNA is found in modern South Asians, and how agriculture got to the Indian subcontinent. Contrary to the current belief that the world’s first farmers emerged from what is today Iran, about 10,000 years ago, and integrated with South Asian hunter-gatherers, the new study suggests the Iranian-related DNA “predates the rise of agriculture in Iran by some 2000 years”.

This means ancient Iranian DNA came from “interbreeding with 12,000-year-old hunter-gatherers, not more recent farmers”, Reich explains in the paper. All this, from one tiny sample of DNA.

A 4,500-old woman from Rakhigarhi spoke this week, and made Indians ask ‘Who are we?’
New DNA study results from Rakhigarhi remains set off a debate about Indian history, politics, and British colonialism online.

Awoman’s skeleton from 2500 BC has finally spoken. A team of Indian and international scientists and archaeologists — who conducted a genetic analysis of the remains of a woman buried in Rakhigarhi, a Harappan site in Haryana — have found no traces of the R1a1 gene, which is often loosely called the ‘Aryan gene’.

This new finding has set off a debate about history, politics and British colonialism online. The enduring “Who we were” question is not a simple one in India anymore. Which is why the ancient Rakhigarhi skeleton is our newsmaker of the week.


What are the findings
The DNA study titled ‘An ancient Harappan genome lacks ancestry from Steppe pastoralists or Iranian farmers’, published Thursday in the science journal Cell, shows that there is no “detectable ancestry from Steppe pastoralists or from Anatolian and Iranian farmers” in the remains of the woman’s skeleton.

It indicates that farming in the Indus Valley Civilisation started locally among indigenous populations and was not a lifestyle brought by those who migrated from the West and Central Asia.

It also indicates the Steppe pastoralists migrated to India after the decline of the Harappan civilisation and brought with them the Indo-European group of languages.


The Aryan ‘invasion’ debate
The finding is being called by many on the internet as a ‘setback’ to what is known as the ‘Aryan invasion theory’.


This theory is said to have been proposed during the British colonial rule to deepen the caste divide in India by claiming that members of the ‘high castes’ were the scions of Aryan invaders from Central Asia who conquered the Harappan Civilisation, and who are also the predecessors of modern Europeans.

Proponents of the Hindutva school of thought, however, argue that the ancestors of Indians were natives of this land, and established Vedic Hinduism. Hindutva ideologues argue that the entire Indian population has a unifying factor in its ancestry in the sense that ancient Indians developed farming and carried forward their civilisation on their own — and were not foreign invaders or migrants.

However, to reduce the study to say it is debunking the Aryan invasion theory is inaccurate and a misreading of history.

When the draft of the study was published earlier last year, Niraj Rai, one of the researchers in the project, told ThePrint that their findings simply implied that “Rakhigarhi residents hadn’t mixed with the central Asians till then”.

What the study really focuses on

The history of how humans advanced from being hunter-gatherers to settled farming communities has always been a question of enormous interest to anthropologists. This is because the shift signifies the birth of close-knit human communities, which led to the rise of civilisations, and eventually modern life as we know it.

The Rakhigarhi DNA study, using genetic data, also tries to establish how farming began in India. Since the Central Asian ‘Steppe’ gene — found in a majority of India’s populace today — was not detected in the Rakhigarhi skeleton, the researchers came to the conclusion that farming in South Asia arose from “local foragers” rather than from migrants from the West.


Interpretations of genetic data are never straightforward or incontestable, which makes them difficult to cram into tweets or headlines that more often than not have a character limit.

A number of news reports chose to devote their headlines on the news study to the Aryan invasion theory, which does not find a single mention in the actual study. Some of the headlines were: “Rakhigarhi DNA study questions Aryan invasion theory” or “New DNA study debunks Aryan invasion theory”, “New Report Based On Genetic Study Questions Aryan Migration Theory, Draws Flak”, “DNA analysis of Rakhigarhi remains challenges Aryan invasion theory”, etc.

This question of ‘Who we really are’, an irrevocable consequence of the Rakhigarhi study, thus triggered the Twitterverse to erupt in outrage.

Tarun Vijay, an RSS and BJP worker, used the findings to say that “All #Indians belong to #India, #Harappan Civilisation”.

2500 BC Rakhigarhi skeletons have no traces of ‘Aryan gene’, finds DNA study
Study examined DNA of skeletons found in Rakhigarhi, an Indus Valley Civilisation site in Haryana, and found no traces of R1a1, or Central Asian ‘steppe’, gene.

The study of DNA samples of the skeletons found in Rakhigarhi, an Indus Valley Civilisation site in Haryana, has found no traces of the R1a1 gene or Central Asian ‘steppe’ genes, loosely termed as the ‘Aryan gene’.

The study — titled ‘An ancient Harappan genome lacks ancestry from Steppe pastoralists or Iranian farmers’ — examined the DNA of the skeletal remains of an individual in Rakhigarhi dating back to around 2500 BC, which was part of the ‘mature Harappan civilisation’ or the Indus Valley Civilisation (IVC).


“The population has no detectable ancestry from Steppe pastoralists or from Anatolian and Iranian farmers, suggesting farming in South Asia arose from local foragers rather than from large-scale migration from the West,” said the study published Friday.

The Central Asian ‘steppe’ gene is found in much of the Indian population today.

“These individuals (in Rakhigarhi) had little of any Steppe pastoralist-derived ancestry, showing that it was not ubiquitous in north-west South Asia during the IVC as it is today,” according to the study.

It added, “While there is a small proportion of Anatolian farmer-related ancestry in South Asians today, it is consistent with being entirely derived from Steppe pastoralists who carried it in mixed form and who spread into South Asia from 2000–1500 BCE.”

The study, led by archaeologist Vasant Shinde, concluded: “Our analysis of data from one individual from the IVC…demonstrates the existence of an ancestry gradient that was widespread in farmers to the northwest of peninsular India at the height of the IVC, that had little if any genetic contribution from Steppe pastoralists or western Iranian farmers or herders, and that had a primary impact on the ancestry of later South Asians.”

However, towards the end of the study, there is a disclaimer, stating, “While our study is sufficient to demonstrate that this ancestry profile was a common feature of the IVC, a single sample — or even the gradient of 12 likely IVC samples we have identified — cannot fully characterise a cosmo-politan ancient civilisation.”

The Aryan invasion theory is said to be the brainchild of India’s former colonial rulers, who peddled the idea that members of the country’s high castes were descendants of Aryan invaders from Central Asia who are also the forebears of the Europeans.

Some Hindu groups subsequently argued that Aryans were not invaders at all, but native to the land, and that these indigenous people developed Vedic Hinduism. The invasion theory suggests that Vedic Hinduism was developed by European migrants, and came after the Indus Valley civilisation.

Ancient DNA from India’s Rakhigarhi archaeological site is telling volumes about the destiny of the mysterious Indus Valley Civilization.

Around 3000 BC, Neolithic hunters in northern Scotland began settling into new sedentary lifestyles and erected vast stone circles and burial chambers, while in Egypt at this time the first pyramids were built. Meanwhile, the Harappans of South Asia, better known as the Indus Valley Civilization , erected massive brick housing complexes connected with extensive canal systems , yet hardly anything was known of the actual people, until now.

At its peak the civilization covered northwestern India and parts of eastern Pakistan and besides ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia it was one of the world’s first urban agricultural societies with five cities holding a population of between 1 million and 5 million. The series of collapses of ancient Egyptian dynasties is relatively well known, but the causes of the fall of the Harappan civilization around 1700 BC are much less understood, and that’s why this new genome research of an ancient Harappan is making the headlines.

Hot Climates Scorch Scientists Efforts
The team of researchers, led by geneticist David Reich from Harvard University and archaeologist Vasant Shinde at Deccan College in Pune, India, published their new study on Cell, based on studies at the Indus site known as Rakhigarhi, about 93 miles (150 kilometers) northwest of modern-day Delhi. “More than 60 skeletal pieces, including numerous petrous bones” were tested before the scientists successfully found and extracted a sample of ancient DNA, according to the scientists report.


Rakhigarhi archaeological site, India. (Homeric Origins / YouTube)

Rakhigarhi archaeological site, India. (Homeric Origins / YouTube)

An article in Science Mag explains that the region’s hot climate quickly degrades genetic material and while hundreds of skeletons have been unearthed in the Indus Valley this is the first one to hold valuable DNA, which the report says was sequenced more than 100 times to piece together what was called a “relatively complete genome”. Reich said, “There’s no doubt this is the most intensive effort we’ve ever made to get ancient DNA from a single sample.” While the findings say little about ‘why’ the society collapsed a new story is revealed about its continuing genetic legacy in modern Indians.

5,000-Year-Old Harappan Migrants
The DNA was sampled from an individual that was most likely female, who was found buried among dozens of ceramic bowls and vases dated to between 2800 and 2300 BC. Her genome closely matched DNA samples from 11 other individuals who had been found in Iran and Turkmenistan, with whom the Harrapans traded. Because the 11 individuals had ”little in common genetically with others buried in their regions,” Reich and researchers concluded that they were most likely Harappan migrants .


The Helpful Harappan Explains How Ancient Indus Valley Technology Could Solve Many of Today’s Problems
Archaeologists may have located ancient port dating back 4,500 years in Goa
Ancient City of Mohenjo Daro Has Survived 5 Millennia but May Disappear in 2 Decades
The Bronze Age spread of Yamnaya Steppe pastoralist ancestry into two subcontinents—Europe and South Asia. (Science / Fair Use)

The Bronze Age spread of Yamnaya Steppe pastoralist ancestry into two subcontinents—Europe and South Asia. (Science / Fair Use )

The researchers next compared these genetic signatures against DNA from ancient Eurasians as well as modern populations and the researchers made an ‘Indus family tree’ which reveals in its bowers that “genetic stock from the ancient Harrapan civilization can be found in most of today’s Indian population ”, according to the report in  Cell.

Ancient Origins of Harappans Rewritten
What’s more, the paper also says that modern people from north India have “the genetic marks” of Harappans having interbreed with animal herders living on the Eurasian steppe , “moving southward around 2000 BC”. And explaining the once-perplexing genetic link between Europeans and South Asians those steppe herders must have carried European DNA, from previous interbreeding events, and over the next three millennia the groups in north and south India intermixed, leading to the current population’s “complex ancestral mix”.

Evidence suggests Rakhigarhi was a major Harappan city center. (Homeric Origins / YouTube)

Evidence suggests Rakhigarhi was a major Harappan city center. (Homeric Origins / YouTube)

A side observation which excites scientists provides new answers for why ancient Iranian DNA is found in modern South Asians, and how agriculture got to the Indian subcontinent. Contrary to the current belief that the world’s first farmers emerged from what is today Iran, about 10,000 years ago, and integrated with South Asian hunter-gatherers, the new study suggests the Iranian-related DNA “predates the rise of agriculture in Iran by some 2000 years”.

This means ancient Iranian DNA came from “interbreeding with 12,000-year-old hunter-gatherers, not more recent farmers”, Reich explains in the paper. All this, from one tiny sample of DNA.




Indians came from a genetic pool predominantly belonging to an indigenous ancient civilisation

The first study of the DNA samples of the skeletal remains excavated from Rakhigarhi, an Indus Valley Civilisation (IVC) site in Haryana, has found no traces of Iranian farmer or steppe pastoralist ancestry, which according to the lead archaeologist in the team raises doubt over the long-held theory of Aryan invasion or migration into South Asia.

“The paper indicates that there was no Aryan invasion and no Aryan migration and that all the developments right from the hunting-gathering stage to modern times in South Asia were done by indigenous people,” Prof Vasant Shinde, lead author of the paper, told ET.

The findings of the study, which took over three years to complete, authored by a team of Indian archaeologists and DNA experts from Harvard Medical School was published on Thursday in the scientific journal ‘Cell’ under the title: ‘An Ancient Harappan Genome Lacks Ancestry from Pastoralists and Iranian Farmers’. The paper concludes Indians came from a genetic pool predominantly belonging to an indigenous ancient civilisation. The findings are based on the study of the ancient genome in the skeletons excavated from a burial site at Rakhigarhi, which is among the biggest Indus Valley locations, spread across 300 hectares near Hisar. It belongs to the mature phase of the Harappan period, dating back to about 2800-2300 BC.

The paper makes three key points: The skeletal remains from the Rakhigarhi individual was from a population that is “the largest source of ancestry for South Asians”; the “Iranian related ancestry in South Asia split from Iranian plateau lineage over 12,000 years ago”; the “first farmers of the fertile crescents contributed little to no ancestry to later south Asians”.

The paper is authored by Vasant Shinde of Deccan College of Pune, Vageesh Narasimhan and David Reich of Harvard Medical School and Niraj Rai of the Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences among others. The paper claims Iranian genetic traits in the Indus Valley period and in present day South Asians come from ancient Iranian and South East Asian hunter-gatherers, much before the advent of large-scale farming. “The Iranian related ancestry in IVC derives from a lineage leading to early Iranian farmers, herders and hunter-gatherers before their ancestors separated, contradicting the hypothesis that the shared ancestry between early Iranians and South Asians reflects a large-scale spread of western Iranian farmers east. Instead, sampled ancient genomes from the Iranian plateau and IVC descend from different groups of hunter gatherers who began farming without being connected by substantial movement of people,” the paper states.

The study suggests farming skills have been developed indigenously contrary to prevalent theories that these came with migrants from the Steppes and Anatolian farmers. As the paper states: “(These findings) in South Asia as in Europe, the advent of farming was not mediated directly by descendants of the world’s first farmers who lived in the fertile crescent. Instead populations of hunter-gatherers — in Eastern Anatolia in the case of Europe and in a yet unsampled location in the case of South Asia — began farming without large-scale movement of people into these regions.”

The paper claims: “Multiple lines of evidence suggest the genetic similarity of I6113 (the Rakhigarhi burial DNA) to the Indus Periphery Cline individuals is due to gene flow from South Asia rather than in the reverse direction.”

राखीगढी डीएनए अभ्यासानुसार आर्यन आक्रमण सिद्धांतावर प्रश्न पडतात, असा दावा लेखक करतात
राखीगढीपासून उत्खनन केलेल्या कंकालमधील प्राचीन जीनोमच्या अभ्यासावर आधारित हे निष्कर्ष आहेत.

कंकालच्या डीएनए नमुन्यांचा पहिला अभ्यास हरियाणातील सिंधू घाटी सभ्यता (आयव्हीसी) साइट राखीगढीपासून उत्खनन केलेला आहे, इराणी शेतकरी किंवा गवताळ प्रदेशातील पशुपालकांच्या वंशजांचा कोणताही शोध आढळला नाही. टीममधील अग्रगण्य पुरातत्वशास्त्रज्ञांच्या मते संशयास्पद स्थिती निर्माण झाली आहे. आर्यन आक्रमण किंवा दक्षिण आशियात स्थलांतर करण्याचा दीर्घ-काळाचा सिद्धांत.

पेपरचे आघाडीचे लेखक प्रा. वसंत शिंदे यांनी सांगितले की, “पेपरात असे सूचित केले गेले आहे की आर्य आक्रमण झाले नाही आणि आर्य स्थलांतर झाले नाही आणि शिकार-मेळाव्यापासून दक्षिण आशियातील आधुनिक काळापर्यंतच्या सर्व घडामोडी स्वदेशी लोक घेतल्या आहेत. ईटी.

भारतीय पुरातत्वशास्त्रज्ञ आणि हार्वर्ड मेडिकल स्कूलच्या डीएनए तज्ज्ञांच्या पथकाने पूर्ण केलेल्या या अभ्यासाचे निष्कर्ष गुरुवारी 'सेल' या वैज्ञानिक जर्नल मध्ये प्रकाशित केले गेले होते: 'अ‍ॅन अ‍ॅडिएंट हडप्पा जनुम लॅक्स अँसेस्ट्री' पशुपालक आणि इराणी शेतकरी यांचेकडून. भारतीय लोक प्रामुख्याने स्वदेशी प्राचीन संस्कृतीशी संबंधित अनुवांशिक तलावावरून आले असा निष्कर्ष काढला होता. हे निष्कर्ष हिसार जवळील hect०० हेक्टर क्षेत्रामध्ये पसरलेल्या सिंधू खो Valley्यातील सर्वात मोठ्या ठिकाणी असलेल्या राखीगढी येथील दफनस्थानावरून उत्खनन केलेल्या प्राचीन सांगाड्याच्या प्राचीन जीनोमच्या अभ्यासावर आधारित आहेत. हे हडप्पाच्या काळाच्या परिपक्व अवस्थेचे आहे, जे इ.स.पू. सुमारे २00००-२3०० पूर्वीचे आहे.

कागदावर तीन महत्त्वाचे मुद्दे आहेत: राखीगढीच्या व्यक्तीचे सांगाडे अवशेष “दक्षिण एशियाई लोकांसाठी सर्वात मोठा स्त्रोत” असलेल्या लोकसंख्येचे होते; "दक्षिण आशियातील इराणीशी संबंधित मूळ वंश 12,000 वर्षांपूर्वी इराणी पठाराच्या वंशापासून विभक्त झाला"; “सुपीक चंद्राच्या पहिल्या शेतकर्‍यांनी नंतरच्या दक्षिण आशियाई लोकांमध्ये काही वंश नव्हता”.

पेपरचे लेखन पुण्यातील डेक्कन कॉलेजचे वसंत शिंदे, हार्वर्ड मेडिकल स्कूलचे डेव्हिड रेच आणि बीरबल साहनी इन्स्टिट्यूट ऑफ पॅलेओसियन्सचे नीरज राय यांनी केले आहे. सिंधू खो Valley्यातील काळातील इराणी अनुवंशिक गुणधर्म आणि वर्तमानकाळात दक्षिण आशियाई लोक मोठ्या प्रमाणात शेती करण्याच्या अगोदर प्राचीन इराणी आणि दक्षिण-पूर्व आशियाई शिकारी जमतात. “आयव्हीसीमधील इराणी संबंधित वंशज वंशाच्या वंशजातून सुरुवातीच्या इराणी शेतकरी, कळप आणि शिकारी जमले त्यांचे पूर्वज विभक्त होण्यापूर्वी, इराणी आणि दक्षिण आशियाई लोकांमधील सामायिक वंशज पश्चिम इराणी शेतक farmers्यांचा मोठ्या प्रमाणात प्रसार प्रतिबिंबित करतात या कल्पनेला विरोध करतात. पूर्व. त्याऐवजी, इराणी पठार व आयव्हीसी मधील नमुनेदार प्राचीन जीनोम लोकांच्या मोठ्या हालचालीने न जुळता शेती करण्यास सुरवात करणारे शिकारी गोळा करणारे वेगवेगळे गट आहेत. ”

या अभ्यासानुसार शेतीची कौशल्ये स्थानिक पातळीवर विकसित केल्या गेलेल्या प्रचलित सिद्धांताच्या विपरीत विकसित केल्या गेल्या आहेत जे स्टेप्स आणि atनाटोलियन शेतक .्यांकडून आलेल्या परप्रांतीयांसोबत आले आहेत. पेपरात म्हटल्याप्रमाणे: “(हे निष्कर्ष) युरोपप्रमाणे दक्षिण आशियात, शेतीची सुगंध जगातील प्रथम शेतकरी सुपीक चंद्रकोरात राहणा directly्यांद्वारे थेट मध्यस्थी केली गेली नव्हती. त्याऐवजी शिकारी गोळा करणार्‍यांची लोकसंख्या - युरोपच्या बाबतीत पूर्वीच्या olनाटोलियामध्ये आणि दक्षिण आशियाच्या बाबतीत अद्याप न वापरलेल्या ठिकाणी - या प्रदेशात मोठ्या प्रमाणात लोकांची हालचाल न करता शेती करण्यास सुरवात केली. ”

पेपर दावा करतो: “पुष्कळ पुरावे सिंधु परिघीय क्लाइन लोकांकडे आय 6113 (राखीगढ़ी दफन डीएनए) ची अनुवांशिक समानता सूचित करतात उलट उलट दिशेने न जाता दक्षिण आशियातून जनुक वाहतात.”

==============
कंकाल के डीएनए नमूनों के पहले अध्ययन में हरियाणा में सिंधु घाटी सभ्यता (IVC) स्थल राखीगढ़ी से खुदाई की गई, जिसमें ईरानी किसान या स्टेपी देहाती वंश का कोई निशान नहीं मिला है, जिसके अनुसार टीम के प्रमुख पुरातत्वविद् ने संदेह जताया है आर्यन के आक्रमण या दक्षिण एशिया में प्रवास के लंबे समय से आयोजित सिद्धांत।

"कागज इंगित करता है कि कोई आर्यन आक्रमण और कोई आर्यन प्रवास नहीं था और दक्षिण एशिया में शिकार-सभा के मंच से आधुनिक काल तक के सभी घटनाक्रम स्वदेशी लोगों द्वारा किए गए थे," प्रोफेसर वसंत शिंदे, कागज के प्रमुख लेखक, ने बताया ईटी।

अध्ययन के निष्कर्ष, जिसे पूरा करने में तीन साल लगे, हार्वर्ड मेडिकल स्कूल के भारतीय पुरातत्वविदों और डीएनए विशेषज्ञों की एक टीम द्वारा गुरुवार को वैज्ञानिक पत्रिका 'सेल' में शीर्षक के तहत प्रकाशित किया गया था: 'एन एंशिएंट हड़प्पा जीनोम लीन एनेस्ट्री पादरीवादियों और ईरानी किसानों से '। यह निष्कर्ष निकाला गया है कि भारतीय मूल रूप से एक आनुवांशिक पूल से आते हैं जो एक स्वदेशी प्राचीन सभ्यता से संबंधित है। निष्कर्ष राखीगढ़ी में एक दफन स्थल से खुदाई किए गए कंकालों में प्राचीन जीनोम के अध्ययन पर आधारित हैं, जो हिसार के पास 300 हेक्टेयर में फैले सबसे बड़े सिंधु घाटी स्थानों में से एक है। यह हड़प्पा काल के परिपक्व चरण का है, जो लगभग 2800-2300 ईसा पूर्व का है।

कागज तीन प्रमुख बिंदु बनाता है: कंकाल राखीगढ़ी से रहता है, जो एक आबादी से था, जो "दक्षिण एशियाई लोगों के लिए वंश का सबसे बड़ा स्रोत" है; "दक्षिण एशिया में ईरानी संबंधित वंशावली 12,000 साल पहले ईरानी पठार वंश से विभाजित"; "उपजाऊ अपराधियों के पहले किसानों ने बाद में दक्षिण एशियाइयों के लिए कोई वंश नहीं होने में योगदान दिया"।

इस पेपर के लेखक हैं पुणे के डेक्कन कॉलेज के वसंत शिंदे, हार्वर्ड मेडिकल स्कूल के वगेश नरसिम्हन और डेविड रीच और बीरबल साहनी इंस्टीट्यूट ऑफ पलायोसाइंसेस के नीरज राय। कागज सिंधु घाटी अवधि में ईरानी आनुवंशिक लक्षणों का दावा करता है और वर्तमान में दक्षिण एशियाई लोग बड़े पैमाने पर खेती के आगमन से बहुत पहले प्राचीन ईरानी और दक्षिण पूर्व एशियाई शिकारी इकट्ठा से आते हैं। "IVC में ईरानी संबंधित वंश वंश से पूर्व ईरानी किसानों, चरवाहों और शिकारी कुत्तों के लिए उनके वंशजों के अलग होने से पहले का है, जो इस परिकल्पना का खंडन करता है कि शुरुआती ईरानी और दक्षिण एशियाई लोगों के बीच साझा वंश पश्चिमी ईरानी किसानों के बड़े पैमाने पर प्रसार को दर्शाता है। पूर्व। इसके बजाय, ईरानी पठार और IVC के प्राचीन जीनोमों को शिकारी इकट्ठा करने वालों के विभिन्न समूहों से उतारा जाता है, जो लोगों के पर्याप्त आंदोलन से जुड़े बिना खेती शुरू करते हैं, “पेपर बताता है।

अध्ययन से पता चलता है कि खेती के कौशल को विकसित सिद्धांतों के विपरीत स्वदेशी रूप से विकसित किया गया है जो कि स्टेपीज़ और अनातोलियन किसानों के प्रवासियों के साथ आए थे। जैसा कि कागज में लिखा है: "(ये निष्कर्ष) दक्षिण एशिया में यूरोप की तरह, खेती का आगमन सीधे दुनिया के पहले किसानों के वंशजों द्वारा मध्यस्थता से नहीं किया गया था जो उपजाऊ वर्धमान में रहते थे। यूरोप के मामले में पूर्वी अनातोलिया में और दक्षिण एशिया के मामले में अभी तक अपरिचित स्थान पर - इन क्षेत्रों में लोगों के बड़े पैमाने पर आंदोलन के बिना खेती शुरू हुई।

कागज़ का दावा है: "सबूतों की कई लाइनें I6113 (राखीगढ़ी दफन डीएनए) की आनुवंशिक समानता का संकेत सिंधु परिधि सेलीन व्यक्तियों को देती हैं, क्योंकि यह रिवर्स दिशा के बजाय दक्षिण एशिया से जीन प्रवाह के कारण है।"

Wednesday, March 27, 2019

Sunday, September 16, 2018

Hanuman Chalisa MS Subbulakshmi




hanuman chalisa ms subbulakshmi hanuman chalisa ms subbulakshmi mp3 320kbps hanuman chalisa ms subbulakshmi dailymotion hanuman chalisa ms subbulakshmi listen online hanuman chalisa ms subbulakshmi mp3 youtube hanuman chalisa ms subbulakshmi lyrics hanuman chalisa ms subbulakshmi with lyrics in telugu hanuman chalisa by ms subbulakshmi youtube hanuman chalisa lyrics nama ramayanam by ms subbulakshmi nama ramayanam ms subbulakshmi hanuman chalisa by ms subbulakshmi hanuman chalisa download hanuman chalisa ms subbulakshmi saavn m. s. subbulakshmi kurai ondrum ms subbulakshmi bhavayami gopala balam m. s. subbulakshmi deva devam bhaje ms subbulakshmi samarpanam m. s. subbulakshmi deva devam m. s. subbulakshmi shreeman narayana m. s. subbulakshmi lakshmi ashtothram

Thursday, August 30, 2018

Who wrote Pledge of India in Marathi



who wrote pledge of india in marathi
indian pledge in marathi
india pledge in english
indian pledge writer
indian pledge in malayalam
indian pledge in kannada
indian pledge in gujarati
indian pledge in malayalam lyrics
pydimarri venkata subba rao
who wrote national anthem
who wrote the vande mataram
who wrote indian national anthem
hindi pledge
who wrote indian constitution
indian pledge in hindi
hindi pratigya
pledge in telugu
telugu pledge
indian pledge in english audio
importance of pledge in school
indian pledge in english mp3 free download
indian pratidnya in marathi
vangara venkata subbaiah
bharat hamara desh hai pledge
butchi babu
school pledge in malayalam
kv pledge in sanskrit
chatra pratigya in sanskrit
who wrote indian pledge in malayalam
india ente rajyam anu in malayalam


Majhi Aai essay in marathi for 10th std

majhi aai essay in marathi for 5th std
majhi aai marathi nibandh
mazi aai nibandh in marathi wikipedia
majhi aai nibandh marathi madhe
short essay on majhi aai in marathi
majhi aai essay in marathi pdf
studymode mazi aai essay in marathi
essay on my mother in marathi for class 5
marathi kavita mazi aai
my mother essay in english
majhi aaji nibandh in marathi
my mother poem in marathi
few lines on mother in marathi
majhi aaji essay in marathi wikipedia
mazi aai essay in english
aaiche mahatva essay in marathi
maza adarsh essay in marathi
mazi aai essay in hindi
aai fb
aai baba nibandh
i wish a nibandh marathi
sampavar meaning in marathi
paus sampavar geli tar
aai var nibandh
surya ugavala nahi tar nibandh marathi
my marathi nibandh
shikshak sampavar geli tar essay in marathi
aai baba essay in marathi
mazi aaji marathi kavita
my mother comp in marathi
my mother mahiti
aai maza guru essay in marathi

Wednesday, December 30, 2015

Machine 'learns' like a human

Scientists have invented a machine that imitates the way the human brain learns new information, a step forward for artificial intelligence, researchers reported.
The system described in the journal Science is a computer model "that captures humans' unique ability to learn new concepts from a single example," the study said.
"Though the model is only capable of learning handwritten characters from alphabets, the approach underlying it could be broadened to have applications for other symbol-based systems, like gestures, dance moves, and the words of spoken and signed languages."
Picture taken at the permanent exhibition "C3RV34U" at the "Cité des Sciences et de l'Industrie" in Paris, dedicated to the human brain
Picture taken at the permanent exhibition "C3RV34U" at the "Cité des Sciences et de l'Industrie" in Paris, dedicated to the human brain
Joshua Tenenbaum, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute for Technology (MIT), said he wanted to build a machine that could mimic the mental abilities of young children.
"Before they get to kindergarten, children learn to recognize new concepts from just a single example, and can even imagine new examples they haven't seen," said Tenenbaum.
"We are still far from building machines as smart as a human child, but this is the first time we have had a machine able to learn and use a large class of real-world concepts -- even simple visual concepts such as handwritten characters -- in ways that are hard to tell apart from humans."
The system is a called a "Bayesian Program Learning" (BPL) framework, where concepts are represented as simple computer programs.
Researchers showed that the model could use "knowledge from previous concepts to speed learning on new concepts," such as building on knowledge of the Latin alphabet to learn letters in the Greek alphabet.
"The authors applied their model to over 1,600 types of handwritten characters in 50 of the world's writing systems, including Sanskrit, Tibetan, Gujarati, Glagolitic -- and even invented characters such as those from the television series Futurama," said the study.
Since humans require very little data to learn a new concept, the research could lead to new advances in artificial intelligence, the study authors said.
"It has been very difficult to build machines that require as little data as humans when learning a new concept," said Ruslan Salakhutdinov, an assistant professor of computer science at the University of Toronto.
"Replicating these abilities is an exciting area of research connecting machine learning, statistics, computer vision, and cognitive science."

The machine that learns like a CHILD: Algorithm recognises and scribbles symbols that look identical to those produced by humans

  • Software has been called the Bayesian Program Learning framework
  • It recognises a symbol by looking at it once and copying its general shape
  • The framework can even draw symbols that are hard to spot by humans
  • Machines usually take hundreds of attempts to memorise visual concepts

When children are shown a new object, such as letter in the alphabet, a picture or a real-world item, they generally only need a couple of instances to be able to identify it accurately.
Machines, by comparison, have to be trained hundreds and thousands of times to not only identify an object, but also to recognise it from different angles.
But researchers have designed an algorithm to solve this problem by allowing computers to learn visually in the same way as humans do.
Scroll down for video 
A computer algorithm that memorises general shapes of objects and can draw them out again has shown computers can learn visually in the same way as young children. The images above were drawn by a the computer and by a human. The machine generated symbols 1 and 2 in the top row and 2 and 1 in the second
A computer algorithm that memorises general shapes of objects and can draw them out again has shown computers can learn visually in the same way as young children. The images above were drawn by a the computer and by a human. The machine generated symbols 1 and 2 in the top row and 2 and 1 in the second
This has allowed the machines to not only identify an object from its shape, but also draw it for themselves - much in the same way young children do when they are learning.
For example the machine can be shown a letter of the alphabet or a symbol and then draw it.

The resulting sketches were almost indistinguishable from those drawn by humans. 
Professor Joshua Tenenbaum, a cognitive scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who was one of the researchers involved in the study, said: 'Before they get to kindergarten, children learn to recognise new concepts from just a single example, and can even imagine new examples they haven't seen'
Humans need a couple of instances to be able to identify a symbol. It takes thousands of examples for a machine to learn one (artist's impression)
Humans need a couple of instances to be able to identify a symbol. It takes thousands of examples for a machine to learn one (artist's impression)
'We are still far from building machines as smart as a human child, but this is the first time we have had a machine able to learn and use a large class of real-world concepts - even simple visual concepts such as handwritten characters - in ways that are hard to tell apart from humans.'
The algorithm was created along with Dr Brenden Lake, a cognitive scientist from New York University.
When a child is shown the letter A, for example, they can identify the same shape even when it is written by different people in slightly different ways. 
Equally, showing someone a single picture of a kettle will likely be enough for that person to recognise other non-identical kettles, of different shapes and colours.
The team's program, called 'Bayesian Program Learning' (BPL) framework, was developed to work in a similar way.
When the computer is presented with a symbol - for instance, the letter A - it starts randomly generating different examples of that symbol, in various ways it could have been drawn.
Rather than looking at the symbol as a cluster of pixels, BPL memorises it as the result of a 'generative process'. 
This involves establishing which specific strokes were made to draw it. 
This approach allows the machine to recognise the letter in various guises, such as the differences between how two people draw the letter for example.
In what they called a 'Visual Turing Test', the researchers showed both the handwritten and the machine-generated doodles to a group of people. Fewer than 25 per cent could spot the computer generated doodles. In the picture above the machine generated symbols are B and A in the top row and A and B in the bottom
In what they called a 'Visual Turing Test', the researchers showed both the handwritten and the machine-generated doodles to a group of people. Fewer than 25 per cent could spot the computer generated doodles. In the picture above the machine generated symbols are B and A in the top row and A and B in the bottom
The model was tested on more than 1,600 types of handwritten symbols in 50 different alphabets or codes. 
These included Sanskrit, Tibetan, Gujarati, Glagolitic, and even imaginary letters shown in the television series Futurama.

THE VISUAL TURING TEST 

Taking a leaf out of Alan Turing - the British computer scientist who devised a question-based test to tell the difference between a man and a machine-  the researchers asked their program and some human volunteers to invent new characters in the style of those they had been shown.
Then, in what they called a 'Visual Turing Test', both the handwritten and the machine-generated symbols were shown to another group of people, who were asked to identify which symbols had been created by the program.
 The researchers reported that fewer than 25 percent of the 'judges' managed to guess which symbols were computer-generated at a percentage significantly better than chance.
The program was consistently able to reproduce the characters after being shown only one example for each of them.
Taking it a step further, the researchers asked the machine as well as human volunteers to invent new characters in the style of those they had been shown. 
Then, in what the researchers called a 'visual Turing Test', both the handwritten and the machine-generated symbols were shown to another group of people, who were asked to identify which symbols had been created by the program. 
The researchers reported that fewer than 25 per cent of the 'judges' managed to guess which symbols were computer-generated at a percentage significantly better than chance.
'Our results show that by reverse engineering how people think about a problem, we can develop better algorithms,' explained Dr Lake, who was the lead author on the study, which is published in the journal Science.
'Moreover, this work points to promising methods to narrow the gap for other machine learning tasks.